Experiments Show That A Jury Cannot “Disregard” Testimony

A psychology experiment recruited mock juror to read through a transcript of a murder trial . After a key part of evidence came up in motor hotel , the jury was told to “ disregard ” it , just the fashion they might in a real run . That ’s where the problems lead off .

I ’ve been a juror on a trial . I do n’t call up all that much , but one matter I do commend well is the testimony that the judge told me , and the other jurors , to disregard . This is vulgar among jurors . It can be innocuous – anything unusual stands out , and being told to neglect testimony is unusual . Still , it ’s not the style the justice organization is presuppose to work . One experiment suggests we ca n’t quash it .

A group of mock jurors were asked to read through a copy of a slaying trial . At one point , the judge hold the evidence from a tap inadmissible . Through the magic of data-based consideration , the evidence is sometimes inadmissible because the information was unreliable , and sometimes inadmissible because it was n’t obtained legally . In some transcripts , the telegram tap grounds is considered admissible .

Second Screen Portable 15 Monitor

When it add up to deciding whether the defendant was shamefaced or innocent , the jurors who understand that the wire pat was inadmissible due to illegality tended to vote like the jurors who register that the wire tap was admissible . Only the ones who show that the wire tap was unreliable failed to act like it was prescribed evidence .

The juryman did n’t inevitably consciously think they were condemning a person because of an illegal wire tap . By interview them , the researchers found they often strengthen the meaning and reliability of other evidence . Still , the telegram hydrant made a conflict . Is there any way around this , or should lawyer just design for it and exploit it ? Lawyer readers , allow us know your persuasion !

range : Gavel

Hp 17 Touchscreen Laptop