Photo: Cinnaminson Middle School
Indeed, the Cinnaminson Township Public Schools district that recently tried to oust Joseph Michael DeShan for alleged “conduct unbecoming a staff member,” had already investigated him in 2002 after reports of his 1988 “relationship” with the teen girl went public.
The district responded at that time with a three-week “administrative suspension” of DeShan, but after finding no more concerns then, it allowed DeShan back into the classroom, the arbitrator noted.
Because the district knew about and had cleared DeShan before new concerns about him arose last fall, the arbitrator found no merit in “alleged hearsay complaints” based on “pre-employment conduct” and ordered the district to reinstate the suspended teacher.
DeShan, who previously portrayed his prior encounters with the teen girl as consensual, never faced criminal charges due to the expired statute of limitations, reportsNJ.com. However, under Connecticut state law, sex with a child under 16 qualifies as statutory rape.
• Want to keep up with the latest crime coverage? Clickhereto get breaking crime news, ongoing trial coverage and details of intriguing unsolved cases in the True Crime Newsletter.
The arbitration findings on behalf of the New Jersey Department of Education detail the background in the case.
“Joseph DeShan has been a teacher at Cinnaminson Middle School and Rush Elementary School in the Cinnaminson School District for approximately 22 years,” it states. “Prior to his employment with the district, DeShan was a Roman Catholic priest in the Bridgeport, Connecticut Diocese. In 1988 he had a sexual relationship with a 14-year-old female. A child was born from their relationship in 1990 when the female was 16 years old. DeShan left the priesthood around 1994 and became a Cinnaminson school teacher in 1996.”
It continues: “In 2002 Connecticut newspapers reported on DeShan’s relationship with the minor. On April 12, 2002, the Cinnaminson Board of Education, previously unaware of the relationship and DeShan’s former vocation as a priest, placed DeShan on administrative suspension. Three weeks later he was returned to the classroom with no further discipline or adverse effect on his employment.”
The arbitrator added: “The fact that some parents now demand his removal from the classroom does not give the [school board] a second opportunity to revisit pre-employment conduct of which it has been long aware.”
After the district moved to fire DeShan, the teacher filed a motion in January to block the effort, which the arbitrator said focused “on both current and past conduct” before concluding that the latest allegation, lacking further evidence from the district, “is clearly based on hearsay.”
The district is considering how to proceed.
source: people.com
