The excited scientist is an icon of modern democratic polish , but critics have traced its origin back centuries . Yet there seem to be few female mad scientist . Which is remaining , because the first significant fabricated unbalanced scientist was a woman .
Brian Aldiss , in Billion Year Spree ( 1973 ) , puts the mad scientist ’s line of descent in Mary Shelley ’s Frankenstein ( 1818 ) . Darko Suvin , in The Metamorphosis of Science Fiction ( 1979 ) , put forward the Laputans ( of Swift ’s Gulliver ’s Travels ( 1726 ) ) as “ the first ‘ mad scientist ’ in SF . ” Brian Stableford , in his essay “ Scientists ” ( 1973 ) , goes further back , submit that the mad scientist “ inherited the chimneypiece and the public image of the medieval alchemist , astrologers , and thaumaturgist . ” Robert Plank , in The worked up Significance of Imaginary Beings ( 1968 ) , claims Shakespeare ’s Prospero for the original crazy scientist . And Peter Goodrich , in his “ The Lineage of Mad Scientists ” ( 1986 ) , function farther still , name diachronic mad scientists , including the Persian scientist Alhazen ( 965 - 1040 ) and the English philosopher Roger Bacon ( 1214 - 1294 ) , before retrace the descent of the mad scientist back to Merlin and to Prometheus , the Titan of Greek myth .
But the first mad scientist is doubtless Mathésis . She is the foremother of a long , but often neglect , custom of female mad scientist in lit . Here we search the history of moonstruck ma’am of in the laboratory .
insane Mathésis , Her Feet All Bare
“ Mathésis ” is the ancient Grecian full term for learning / mathematics / knowledge / science , and in Alexander Pope ’s satire “ The Dunciad ” ( 1728 ) Mathésis appears as a prisoner of the goddess Dulness :
demented Mathesis alone was unconfined
Too unrestrained for mere material chains to bind
Now to pure blank raising her ecstatic stare
Now range round the Circle finds it satisfying .
But in Christopher Smart ’s “ The Temple of Dulness ” ( 1745 ) , Mathésis takes on a more dark undertone :
Next to her , delirious Mathesis ; her feet all simple ,
Ungirt , untrimm’d , with open neglected hair ;
No alien object can her thoughts disjoint ;
Reclin’d she ride , and ponders o’er a point
Before her , lo ! inscrib’d upon the priming coat
Strange diagram th’astonish’d mickle confound ,
Right lines and curves , with figures square and round .
With these the monstrosity , chesty and vain ,
Boasts that she can all mysteries explain ,
And care for the sacred sisters with patronage ,
She , when smashing Newton seek his kindred skies ,
Sprung richly in air , and strove with him to rise
In vain — the mathematic mob limit
Her trajectory , indignant , and on earth detains ;
E’er since the captive wretch her brain employ
On dawdling fallal , and on bangle toy .
Smart adapted Mathésis ’ madness . Rather than someone whose insanity is harmless , Mathésis becomes a “ monster , arrogant and vain . ” who creates “ trifling trinkets ” and “ gewgaw toys . ” There is not a spate of length between Smart ’s Mathésis , with her “ free leave out hair ” and “ trifling gaud , ” and the modern mad scientist , with his unkempt , wild hair and grave technology . But Mathésis is distaff , not male person .
No rush of fictional mad scientists , male person or female , follow “ The Temple of Dulness . ” The Romantics in general saw scientists as either impractical theorists or wicked materialists , and an episodic sick scientist showed up in Gothic tarradiddle and novels , but it was n’t until Frankenstein that the mad scientist was fully transformed from the medieval alchemist to a modern lineament . Although virile mad scientist set about appearing with some geometrical regularity in the 1860s , in centime dreadfuls and dime novel , it was n’t until the 1890s , 150 years after “ The Temple of Dulness , ” that female mad scientists lead off appearing .
Pre-20th Century Female Scientists
It might be objected that the hold in the appearance of fabricated female insane scientists come from a lack of veridical - life history models . But this objection , however fair , is based on false premises . Though small compared to their male counterparts , there were female scientists active in the 19th 100 , both amateurs and professional person , and some some of those women were notable even in their lifetimes . As far back as the 1650s Margaret Cavendish ( 1623 - 1673 ) was well - known for her study on “ innate philosophy , ” the pre-19th century idiomatic expression for the study of the physical sciences , and one of the most significant mathematicians of the second one-half of the 19th hundred was Sofia Kovalevskaya ( 1850 - 1891 ) .
AsRichard Holmes guide out , women played an important role in the Royal Society of London , historically the most important scientific establishment of Great Britain . American women were active as scientists from the nation ’s offset , as shown by Joan Hoff ( “ Dancing Dogs of the Colonial Period , ” Early American Literature n7 , Winter 1973 ) , Sally Kohlstedt ( “ In From the Periphery , ” sign v4n1 , Autumn 1978 ) , and Margaret Rossiter ( “ Women Scientists in America Before 1920 , ” American Scientist n62 , May / June 1974 ) .
So there was no want of literal - life distaff scientists . Nor was there a lack of genuine - life female unrestrained scientists on which to mock up fictional female insane scientist . During her lifespan Cavendish was guess to be insane , and Kovalevskaya was not only an active nihilist and revolutionary at fourth dimension in her sprightliness - her fond autobiography istitled Nihilist Girl - but was also an inventor of “ unusual ” electrical machinery .
The explanation is likely sexism , but a peculiarly Victorian form of sexism . Although the sexism of the nineteenth C forbid woman from appear in as wide a variety of grand roles in pop fiction as valet de chambre could , there were distaff amateur detectives as too soon as 1837 ( William Burton ’s “ The Secret Cell ” ) , female warriors as early as 1842 ( Timothy Savage ’s The Amazonian Republic , lately Discovered in the Interior of Peru ) , distaff cowboys as ahead of time as 1847 ( Charles Averill ’s The Mexican Ranchero ; or , the Maid of the Chapparal ) , female professional private detective as early as 1864 ( Andrew Forrester , Jr. , ’s The Female Detective ) , female Zorros as early as 1882 ( William Manning ’s “ Lady Jaguar , the Robber Queen ” ) , distaff pirates in 1896 ( Guy Boothby ’s The Beautiful White Devil ) , and even female astronauts in 1900 ( George Griffith ’s “ A sojourn to the Moon ” ) .
However , none of these persona allowed cleaning lady to be intellectually dangerous . No women scientists showed up in popular literature , and only rarely in mainstream lit , with the exception of historic personality like Hypatia ( circa 360 - 415 C.E. ) , who appeared in Charles Kingsley ’s Hypatia ( 1852 - 1853 ) . The premiere fashion model of serious muliebrity in British fiction in the 19th century was the Fatal Woman , the Victorian variation of the femme fatale . But the Fatal Woman is severe sexually and morally , not intellectually .
The Effect of the New Woman
It was n’t until the 1890s , with the advent of the “ New Woman , ” that fictional cleaning woman were allow to be mentally as well as physically and sexually unsafe . The New Woman was a charwoman who took many of the theoretic ideas of feminism and put them into practice as a life style . She was usually a college alumna – women had begun being admitted to the better British colleges in 1847 . She preach self - fulfillment rather than ego - sacrifice , and choose education and a calling over wedlock . The New Woman was verbatim in speech and forthright about her political views . She smoked and drink openly , decry restrictive way , exercised and played play . And she was sexually participating , or at least advocated intimate exemption , and avoided union , see it as a ambuscade designed to overcharge woman of their independency .
The fictitious female mad scientist was one of the many minus fictional reactions to the New Woman . For many middle and upper - class puritanical men , char were the guardians of civilization and English finish ’s gamey value . For the New Woman to reach for more than a role as wife and mother was deep threatening to buttoned-down moralists . For the New Woman to become an intellectual competition to work force was even more alarming . Most novel of the nineties portray the New Woman as come to bad end , and the novel with fictional female scientists are one version of this chemical reaction .
The First Three , And What Made Them Different
The first significant distaff sick scientist – possibly the first at all – is the titular character inGeorge Griffith ’s Olga Romanoff(1893 - 1894 ) . The novel , a sequel to Griffith ’s The Angel of the Revolution ( 1893 ) , is define in the future and is about the elbow grease of Olga , the last of the Romanoffs , to bring down the Aerians , the master race which rule the world . Toward this end Olga Romanoff builds a supersubmarine and a fleet of airships , drug two richly - ranking Aerians and Khalid ( a powerful Muslim ruler ) and makes all them her mind - control lover , and fights a number of bally , losing battle against the Aerians .
These three characters provided the rough model for most of the fictional female mad scientists which would come out over the next sixty years . Like their male person counterparts , fictitious female mad scienitsts were usually portrayed as Faustian ( overweening aspiration ) and Promethean ( strive for Sion ) . But manly mad scientists were usually free-base in their laboratories , and were static , forcing the heroes to come to them ; distaff mad scientists were active and were in the main active outside their laboratories . manlike mad scientists were asexual , either past their sexual prime or , as creatures of mind , above sexual desires ; distaff unbalanced scientist were portrayed as intimate beings , either using their sexual attraction to fake workforce or being sexually profligate as a sign of their moral contrariness .
manlike mad scientists were usually emotionless ( though not emotionless ) , where distaff delirious scientists were passionate . virile mad scientist were usually obsess with their inquiry , and the results of that inquiry – a million pounds sterling or seduction of the world – were of lowly concern ; female mad scientist had some ultimate goal in creative thinker which their research was mean to achieve . manful huffy scientist were rarely portrayed in more than two dimensions ; distaff mad scientists were unremarkably three dimensional characters , or as much so as the writer could make them . Male demented scientist were seldom portray in a sympathetic fashion , while distaff mad scientists almost always were .
A Real Life Female Mad Scientist
The next pregnant distaff mad scientist , however , come from reality and was for the most part an exception to the proceedings . ( Life is rarely as neat or programmatic as art ) . Dr. Louise G. Robinovitch ( née Luisa Rabinowitch ; 1881 - 1942 ) became internationally know in the first decade of the 20th century for her experiments with electricity and anaesthesia , but by 1921 she had withdrawn completely from public notice , and for good reason . In addition to her participation in her chum ’s larceny ( he was convict in 1911 , though her casing was throw by the police for lack of proof ) , newspaper publisher article about her brought to the public ’s attention that she had brought a dead rabbit back to life through electrical energy . paper trumpet that she was a proponent of “ electric anesthesia,”though she refused to discuss her findings with the pressure , and in Paris she had resurrect an ostensibly all in adult female through the software of electrical “ rhythmic excitations . ” Allegedly she plan to prove , in laboratory experiments on fauna ( and , it was hinted , homo ) that resuscitation of the dead via electrical energy would be universally possible in the good future tense . Taken singly or even two at a time , the public could accept these facts , but together they presented the image of a cold , deliberately reclusive genius of dreaded capabilities and ambition .
In this Robinovitch was seen as a photonegative of Thomas Edison , at this time the archetype , in both fable and realness , for the heroic supergenius of popular fiction . Where Edison was a promoter , Robinovitch was a recluse who shunned the press . Where Edison project a genial image , Robinovitch ’s was nerveless , verging on disdainful . And where Edison ’s experiments promise to throw out human civilization , Robinovitch ’s ultimate goal was an archetypal conk out Where Humanity Should n’t Go experiment . Robinovitch was not widely imitated in fiction , but she provided a new archetypal version of the female mad scientist , the passionless , clinical research worker distant from human concerns and fixated on her research .
Experimental Theater and Comic Books
The next major ( fictitious ) distaff mad scientist was Claire Archer , in Susan Glaspell ’s roleplay The Verge ( 1921 ) . Archer is a phytologist who seek to create novel plants which exhibit “ otherness ” and “ outness . ” She nearly achieves “ otherness ” with the the “ Edge Vine ” and the “ Breath of Life , ” which is “ the flower I ’ve created that is outdoors of what blossom have been . ” Archer is emotionally defeated and drive to distraction by the intellectual inferiority of those around her and the impossibleness of pass along her approximation to them , and at the end of the fun she inject her husband . Archer ’s significance comes from Glaspell ’s position : at the time Glaspell was a major experimental dramatist , and her usage of a distaff mad scientist in data-based theater elevated the concept of the female insane scientist from the flesh ridiculous to something which could be taken seriously , just as Wells had done with Doctor Moreau in 1896 .
The distaff mad scientist was a oddment in the pulps , but it only take eighteen months for a female demented scientist to appear in superhero funny volume . activity Comics#20(January , 1940 ) showed Superman ’s first bane , the Ultra - Humanite , putting his ( male ) brain into the dead body of actress Dolores Winters . As Dolores Winters , the Ultra - Humanite push Superman in Action Comics#20and#21before disappearing for forty year . The Ultra - Humanite was not influential , but is interesting as a rarefied object lesson of pulp / comics gender ambiguity , although this look is not bear on upon in either issue of Action Comics .
reputability At Last
The first female mad scientist to seem in sizable , mainstream scientific discipline fable was Barbara Haggerwells , in Ward Moore ’s Bring the Jubilee ( 1953 ) . Haggerwells develops theory of clock time and space which allow her to create a time machine . But because she live in a timeline in which the Confederacy won the Civil War , she manipulates the main grapheme into going back in time and altering the past tense so that the Union wins . Haggerwells is abrasive and psychologically discredited and is a safe example of a female insane scientist who is both mad and on the side of the good guys .
The thirty years follow Bring the Jubilee were a dire period for female mad scientist . The figure of the male mad scientist was increasingly used in a serious mode in picture show and literature , from Dr. Strangelove ( 1963 ) to James Blish ’s Black Easter ( 1968 ) , but the female mad scientist was relegate to modest budget movies and cheap toon . Where the male mad scientist became a meaningful metaphor , the female mad scientist was used in the military service of taxicab horror films . It was n’t until the early 1980s , first with Whitley Streiber ’s novel The Hunger ( 1981 ) , that the distaff mad scientist was used in a serious manner , and since then the distaff mad scientist has been reserve the mutant in character and seriousness that the male mad scientist have always had .
An Incomplete List of Female Mad Scientists
1893 : Olga Romanoff . George Griffith ’s Olga Romanoff . British novel .
1895 : Zalma von der Pahlen . T. Mullett Ellis ’ Zalma . British novel .
1898 : Madame Koluchy . L.T. Meade and Robert Eustace ’s The Brotherhood of the Seven Kings . British novel .
1921 : Claire Archer . Susan Glaspell ’s The Verge . U.S. drama .
1926 : Hilda Thorsby . Petterson Marzoni ’s “ Red Ether . ” U.S. brusk story .
1936 : Malita . The Devil Doll . U.S. film .
1938 : Dr. Hamilton . Daniel Lopez ’s “ Tommy Grey . ” Spanish comic strip .
1940 : Ultra - Humanite . Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster ’s Action Comics#20 . U.S. comic Holy Scripture .
1940 : Dr. Jackson . Son of Ingagi . U.S. film .
1947 : Madame Voss . Steve Dowling and Gordon Boshell ’s “ Garth . ” British risible funnies .
1948 : Dr. Sandra Mornay . Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein . U.S. movie .
1953 : Barbara Haggerwells . Ward Moore ’s Bring the Jubilee . U.S. novel .
1957 : Miss Branding . ancestry of Dracula . U.S. plastic film .
1959 : Dr. Myra . Teenage Zombies . U.S. film .
1964 : Madame Atomos . André Carpouzis ’ La Sinistre Mme Atomos and its 17 sequels .
1965 : “ The Master . ” “ If I Fell . ” The Beatles . U.S. cartoon .
1966 : Dr. Faustina . “ The Night of the Big Blast . ” Wild Wild West . U.S. tv serial .
1966 : Maria Frankenstein . Jesse James suffer Frankenstein ’s Daughter . U.S. picture show .
1966 : Poison Ivy . Robert Kanigher and Sheldon Moldoff ’s Batman#181 . U.S. laughable book . Poison Ivy ’s sore scientist aspects were stress in late appearances .
1970 : Dr. Elaine Frederick . Flesh Feast . U.S. film .
1971 : Tania Frankenstein . La Figlia di Frankenstein . Italian plastic film .
1972 : Dr. Eva Wolfstein . La Furia del Hombre Loco . Spanish film .
1972 : Freda Frankenstein . Santo vs. La Hija de Frankenstein . Mexican film .
1973 : Dr. Caligula . Alabama ’s Ghost . U.S. moving picture .
1973 : Susan Harris . Invasion of the Bee Girls . U.S. picture show .
1973 : Unnamed female mad scientist . Supergirl . Filipino film .
1977 : Dr. Ellen Kratsch . La Bestia in Calore . Italian film .
1977 : Dianne Ashley . Kingdom of the Spiders . U.S. cinema .
1981 : Dr. Sarah Roberts . Whitley Streiber ’s The Hunger . U.S. novel .
1981 : Dr. Gwen Parkinson . Strange Behavior . U.S. film .
1985 . The Rani . “ The Mark of the Rani . ” Doctor Who . U.K. idiot box serial . The Rani by and by appeared in the serial “ Time and the Rani ” ( 1987 ) and the charity special “ Dimensions in Time ” ( 1993 ) .
1987 . Beth Halpern . Michael Crichton ’s Sphere . U.S. novel .
1990 : Dr. Babs Blight . Captain Planet and the Planeteers . U.S. animated cartoon .
1992 : Washu Hakubi . Tenchi Muyo ! Nipponese gum anime .
1993 : Jane Tiptree . Carnosaur . U.S. film .
1995 : Professor Helena Slogar . Keith Baker ’s Gloom . U.S. circuit card game .
1999 : Dr. Susan McCallister . Deep Blue Sea . U.S. film .
2000 : Helen Narbon . Shaenon Garrity ’s Narbonic . U.S. webcomic .
2003 : Doc . Texhnolyze . Japanese anime .
2005 : Angelika Einstürzen . Dogs : smoke and Carnage .
2009 : Dr. Elsa Kast . Splice . U.S. film .
2010 : Zoe Graystone . Caprica . U.S. video series .
My thanks to Mike Ashley , Paul Di Filippo , John Eggeling , Denny Lien , and David Pringle for supporter with research .
Jess Nevins is a librarian , pulp fable historian , and comic book annotator . He also writes encyclopedias . you’re able to find out moreon his web log .
BooksHistoryjess nevins
Daily Newsletter
Get the good tech , science , and civilisation news in your inbox daily .
tidings from the future tense , delivered to your present .
